Hunter v. Abert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hunter v. Abert

2 Mart. (N.S.) 328

DecidedApril 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mart. (N.S.) 328 (Hunter v. Abert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunter v. Abert, 2 Mart. (N.S.) 328 (La. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The appellant has utterly neglected to place this case before us, (by a bill of exceptions, or statement of facts,) in such a manner as to authorise us to reverse the judgment. The evidence was not taken down, and there is no certificate of the judge.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs of both courts, and that the plaintiff recover ten per cent on the sum allowed, for his damages on account of the frivolous appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The appellant has utterly neglected to place this case before us, (by a bill of exceptions, or statement of facts,) in such a manner as to authorise us to reverse the judgment. The evidence was not taken down, and there is no certificate of the judge.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs of both courts, and that the plaintiff recover ten per cent on the sum allowed, for his damages on account of the frivolous appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Mart. (N.S.) 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-v-abert-la-1824.