Hunter Printing Co. v. Ace Restaurant, Inc.

258 A.D. 1020, 17 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 1020 (Hunter Printing Co. v. Ace Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter Printing Co. v. Ace Restaurant, Inc., 258 A.D. 1020, 17 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the Albany county clerk’s office on July 27,1939, directing the Comptroller of the State of New York to pay to the respondent judgment creditor part of refund moneys created through the surrender of a liquor license by the judgment debtor. Appellant had loaned money to the license holder and taken as security an assignment of moneys which might thereafter be due because of the surrender of the license. The assignment was filed with th e State Comptroller on December 3, 1937, two days after the surrender of the license. On December 7, 1937, the respondent obtained a judgment against the licensee. On February 11, 1938, it served a third party subpoena upon the State Comptroller in a proceeding supplementary to judgment and in August, 1938, brought action in the- Supreme Court to have the assignment to appellant declared void. A motion by respondent in that action for summary judgment was denied. It then moved at Special Term in this proceeding for an order directing the Comptroller to pay over to it sufficient of the funds arising from the surrender of the license to satisfy its judgments. This appeal is from the order granting that motion. We believe that an arguable issue exists which should be tried in an action and not disposed of summarily. (Esbeco Distilling Corg. v. Block, ante, p. 757; Id. p. 1001.) Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruppert v. Erikson
264 A.D. 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 1020, 17 N.Y.S.2d 24, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-printing-co-v-ace-restaurant-inc-nyappdiv-1940.