Hunter Manufacturing & Commission Co. v. Leak Manufacturing Co.

201 N.C. 823
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 2, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee. Cueiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Adams, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this particular case, without becoming a precedent for the future. Lawrence v. Bank, 193 N. C., 841, 137 S. E., 427; Miller v. Bank, 176 N. C., 152, 96 S. E., 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N. C., 240, 18 S. E., 208.

This accords with the uniform practice of appellate courts in cases of equal division of opinion. Jenkins v. Lumber Co., 187 N. C., 864, 123 S. E., 82.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunter Manufacturing & Commission Co. v. Leak Manufacturing Co., 201 N.C. 823 (N.C. 1931).

201 N.C. 823 (Hunter Manufacturing & Commission Co. v. Leak Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Bank of Washington
96 S.E. 977 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Lawrence v. Fidelity Bank
137 S.E. 427 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Town of Durham v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
18 S.E. 208 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Jenkins v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)