Hunter Lewis v. Firestone Financial Corp.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-259-CV
HUNTER LEWIS APPELLANT
V.
FIRESTONE FINANCIAL CORP. APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT
----------
On December 21, 2009, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App.
P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the
court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 21, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunter Lewis v. Firestone Financial Corp. (Hunter Lewis v. Firestone Financial Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.