Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium
This text of 561 F. App'x 583 (Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hunter R. Levi appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Section 801 of the Labor Management Relations Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We agree with the district court that the record evidence revealed no disputed issues of material fact on Levi’s claims against Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC. See Sturge v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 658 F.3d 832, 839 (8th Cir.2011) (de novo review). We also find that Levi’s claims would have necessarily failed against the other parties he originally named or sought to add later as defendants. Finally, we decline to consider Levi’s new arguments and allegations. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-levi-v-ab-inbev-nv-of-leuven-belgium-ca8-2014.