Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium

561 F. App'x 583
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 2014
Docket13-3180
StatusUnpublished

This text of 561 F. App'x 583 (Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter Levi v. AB INBEV NV of Leuven Belgium, 561 F. App'x 583 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hunter R. Levi appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under Section 801 of the Labor Management Relations Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 510 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We agree with the district court that the record evidence revealed no disputed issues of material fact on Levi’s claims against Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC. See Sturge v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 658 F.3d 832, 839 (8th Cir.2011) (de novo review). We also find that Levi’s claims would have necessarily failed against the other parties he originally named or sought to add later as defendants. Finally, we decline to consider Levi’s new arguments and allegations. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 F. App'x 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-levi-v-ab-inbev-nv-of-leuven-belgium-ca8-2014.