Hunter-El v. United States

596 F. App'x 923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2015
DocketNo. 2014-5122
StatusPublished

This text of 596 F. App'x 923 (Hunter-El v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunter-El v. United States, 596 F. App'x 923 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sheik Aaron Hunter-El appeals the dismissal of his complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims for lack of prosecution. Under Rule 41(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims, the court may dismiss a case if the plaintiff [924]*924fails to prosecute. Having reviewed the papers and Mr. Hunter-El’s brief, we conclude that the Court of Federal Claims did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Mr. Hunter-El’s complaint. See Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 899 F.2d 1180, 1188 (Fed.Cir.1990). Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED

Costs

No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States
899 F.2d 1180 (Federal Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 F. App'x 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunter-el-v-united-states-cafc-2015.