Home/Supreme Court/Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

144 L. Ed. 2d 842, 120 S. Ct. 10, 527 U.S. 1068, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4743, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10155, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8014, 68 U.S.L.W. 3177
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedSeptember 28, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2043
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 144 L. Ed. 2d 842 (Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 144 L. Ed. 2d 842, 120 S. Ct. 10, 527 U.S. 1068, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4743, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10155, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8014, 68 U.S.L.W. 3177 (U.S. 1999).

Opinion

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, November 12, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 13, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, December 30, 1999. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kleven v. City of Des Moines
111 Wash. App. 284 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
115 F. Supp. 2d 677 (W.D. Virginia, 2000)
Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Reno
212 F.3d 1338 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
State v. Letourneau
100 Wash. App. 424 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Burgess v. Cahall
88 F. Supp. 2d 319 (D. Delaware, 2000)
Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinion
204 F.3d 1187 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Hartson Partnership v. Goodwin
991 P.2d 1211 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Navegar, Inc. v. United States
200 F.3d 868 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Truriel B. Nathan
202 F.3d 230 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
L.S.C. v. State
1999 UT App 315 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1999)
In Re Adoption of AB
991 P.2d 70 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1999)
United States v. Brown
74 F. Supp. 2d 637 (N.D. West Virginia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 L. Ed. 2d 842, 120 S. Ct. 10, 527 U.S. 1068, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 4743, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10155, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8014, 68 U.S.L.W. 3177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-wesson-inc-v-franchise-tax-board-of-california-scotus-1999.