Hunt v. Tinkham
This text of 21 Ill. 639 (Hunt v. Tinkham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court properly overruled the motion to change the venue. No notice of the motion was given, and the statute positively requires a notice. It is a misapprehension to say that here no notice could have been given. It is certain that at least one day’s notice, could have been given, for the affidavit is made the day before the motion, and there is no excuse shown why notice was not given as the statute required.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ill. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-tinkham-ill-1859.