Hunt v. State
206 S.W. 989, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 424, 1918 WL 114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Tex. Crim. 89 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted for violating the prohibition law and punishment assessed at the lowest. There is no statement of facts with the record, which was approved by the trial judge. In the absence of a statement of facts, no question is raised which can be considered upon this appeal. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. State, 206 S.W. 989, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 424, 1918 WL 114 (Tex. 1918).
206 S.W. 989 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.