Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hunt v. State

3 Tex. Ct. App. 116

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hunt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Tex. Ct. App. 212 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1877·Published

Opinion

White, J.

The five appellants in this case were tried [117]*117upon information in the County Court of Hunt County, for disturbance of religious worship. The disturbance consisted in cracking, picking out, and eating pecans in the church during the services. The jury found them guilty and fined them each §25, and judgment was so rendered. There is nothing in the record of which they have any just ground of complaint. Under the proof we think the jury found rightly, and that the judgment is, in every respect, correct. It is, therefore, in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, J.

The five appellants in this case were tried [117]*117upon information in the County Court of Hunt County, for disturbance of religious worship. The disturbance consisted in cracking, picking out, and eating pecans in the church during the services. The jury found them guilty and fined them each §25, and judgment was so rendered. There is nothing in the record of which they have any just ground of complaint. Under the proof we think the jury found rightly, and that the judgment is, in every respect, correct. It is, therefore, in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hunt v. State, 3 Tex. Ct. App. 116 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Pincite

3 Tex. Ct. App. 116 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.