Hunt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hunt v. State

415 S.W.3d 161, 2013 WL 6236736, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1438

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 3, 2013·No. No. ED 99703·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melanie Hunt (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motion for post-conviction'relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melanie Hunt (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motion for post-conviction'relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Hunt v. State, 415 S.W.3d 161, 2013 WL 6236736, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 161 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.