Hunt v. State Highway Department
This text of 115 S.E.2d 384 (Hunt v. State Highway Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case involves the same principle of law and is controlled by State Highway Department v. Hendrix, 215 Ga. 821 (113 S. E. 2d 761), where the Supreme Court in effect held that where a proceeding in rem is brought to condemn property for a public use under the provisions of Chapter 36 of the Code, as amended, tender of the amount awarded by the Special Master to the apparent or ostensible owner of such property is not a condition precedent to the condemnor’s right to pay the award into the registry of the court and enter an appeal to a jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 S.E.2d 384, 101 Ga. App. 797, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-state-highway-department-gactapp-1960.