Hunt v. State
Opinion
This is a pro se appeal from a burglary conviction. The defendant has filed no enumeration of errors.
1. There was an eyewitness to the burglary. The evidence, although conflicting, was amply sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
2. At the close of the charge, defendant’s trial counsel stated he [408] had no exceptions to the charge. Under Jackson v. State, 246 Ga. 459 (271 SE2d 855) this constituted a waiver.
From an examination of the record, no basis for reversal appears.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
278 S.E.2d 61 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.