Hunt v. State

278 S.E.2d 61, 157 Ga. App. 407, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1844
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 6, 1981·No. 61400·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from a burglary conviction. The defendant has filed no enumeration of errors.

1. There was an eyewitness to the burglary. The evidence, although conflicting, was amply sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. At the close of the charge, defendant’s trial counsel stated he [408] had no exceptions to the charge. Under Jackson v. State, 246 Ga. 459 (271 SE2d 855) this constituted a waiver.

Decided February 6, 1981. L. W. Hunt, pro se. Gary C. Christy, District Attorney, for appellee.

From an examination of the record, no basis for reversal appears.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. State, 278 S.E.2d 61, 157 Ga. App. 407, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1844 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

278 S.E.2d 61 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
271 S.E.2d 855 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)