Hunt v. State

114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 274, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 238
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1922
Docket13873
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 924 (Hunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. State, 114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 274, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 238 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction. The special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit, and it was not error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 924, 29 Ga. App. 274, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-state-gactapp-1922.