Hunt v. State
27 S.E. 670, 102 Ga. 569, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 588
Opinion
Where an attorney is appointed by the court to defend a person accused of a felony, the court should allow him a reasonable time for the preparation of the defense, and where a motion for such time is made and refused, and the case is close and doubtful on the facts, justice requires that a new trial should be granted.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. State, 27 S.E. 670, 102 Ga. 569, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 588 (Ga. 1897).
27 S.E. 670 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spillers v. State
245 S.E.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Fluellen v. State
168 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Cummings v. State
107 S.E. 771 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)