Hunt v. State

155 So. 3d 1252, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1034, 2015 WL 340742
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2015·No. No. 4D13-2866·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking appellant’s probation is affirmed, but we remand for compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.995, as the trial court failed to specify the conditions of probation that the appellant was found to have violated. See A.T.J.F. v. State, 78 So.3d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. State, 155 So. 3d 1252, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1034, 2015 WL 340742 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

155 So. 3d 1252 (Hunt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.T.J.F. v. State
78 So. 3d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)