Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hunt v. State

Hunt v. State

183 So. 2d 858, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 1966
DocketNo. 65-818
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 183 So. 2d 858 (Hunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. State, 183 So. 2d 858, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, we are required to review the propriety of an order denying a motion seeking relief, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It appears that this is the second motion for such relief filed in the trial court by the appellant, and it contains substantially the same grounds as that considered by the court in the original motion and, therefore, no error has been made to appear in the trial court’s summarily disposing of same. See: Manning v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 616; Rankin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 324.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGruder v. State
203 So. 2d 345 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Wells v. State
197 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Thompson v. State
187 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 2d 858, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.