Hunt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hunt v. State

172 So. 2d 626, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1965

DocketNo. 64-752

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 So. 2d 626 (Hunt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. State, 172 So. 2d 626, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Hunt was arrested and charged with the crime of armed robbery. At the conclusion of a non-jury trial, he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to the State Penitentiary for ten years. He appeals the judgment of conviction.

Two points are presented; the first of these claims error in the admission into evidence of a gun found near the scene of the crime. We hold that the evidence was properly admitted under the rule stated in Mobley v. State, 41 Fla. 621, 26 So. 732 (1899).

Appellant’s second point indirectly considers the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt. Even though' we doubt the effectiveness of the point stated to raise the question argued, we have reviewed the record and hold that the evidence is sufficient to adequately support the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI