Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hunt v. STAFF LEASING

Hunt v. STAFF LEASING

73 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17539, 2011 WL 5301606
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 2011
Docket1D11-3073
StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 3d 364 (Hunt v. STAFF LEASING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. STAFF LEASING, 73 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17539, 2011 WL 5301606 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, filed on June 21, 2011, and the appellants’ response thereto, the Court has determined that claims disposed of by the lower tribunal in the order on appeal are inextricably intertwined with those claims left pending. Therefore, the April 20, 2011, Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HIJUELOS v. State
73 So. 3d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 3d 364, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17539, 2011 WL 5301606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-staff-leasing-fladistctapp-2011.