Hunt v. Reff

29 A.D.2d 927, 289 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4221

This text of 29 A.D.2d 927 (Hunt v. Reff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Reff, 29 A.D.2d 927, 289 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Order dated December 4, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, and motion by appellants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. The letter terminating plaintiff’s employment did not impute a crime and was but a reasonable explanation for the plaintiff’s discharge. The letter was not libelous per se, and no special damages having been asserted, the matter is not actionable and the complaint must be dismissed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 927, 289 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-reff-nyappdiv-1968.