Hunt v. Peake

5 Cow. 475
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Curia, per Savage, Ch, J.

The general principle is against the liability of the infant; and I do not find that this case is an exception. In Holt v. Ward, (2 Str. 937,) it was decided, after full argument and deliberation, that the contract to marry by an infant is not void; but voidable at the election of the infant; yet, as to the person of full age, contracting with the infant, it absolutely hinds. Hence, an infant may maintain this action against an adult; but an infant defendant is not liable. (Com. Dig. Enfant, B. 6.) The defendant is entitled to judgment,

Judgment for the defendant. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Peake, 5 Cow. 475 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).

5 Cow. 475 (Hunt v. Peake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wise v. Schloesser
82 N.W. 439 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
Leichtweiss v. Treskow
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 487 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Rush v. Wick
31 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1877)
Hamilton v. Lomax
6 Abb. Pr. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Fant v. Cathcart
8 Ala. 725 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Roof v. Stafford
7 Cow. 179 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)