Hunt v. Patterson

38 Mich. 95, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 15
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Entry of Judgment follows Finding of .Facts.

Whore a written request is made seasonably for a finding of facts, and judgment is entered without such finding, it is not error to set aside the judgment and enter a new one after the finding is filed. — Per Curiam.

Error to Kent.

The error assigned was that judgment could not be vacated and a new one entered without notice to the party against whom it had been rendered.

MacLaren & Jennings for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Patterson, 38 Mich. 95, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 15 (Mich. 1878).

38 Mich. 95 (Hunt v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Ferry
28 Kan. 686 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)