Hunt v. Patterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Hunt v. Patterson

38 Mich. 95, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 15

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 Mich. 95 (Hunt v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Patterson, 38 Mich. 95, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 15 (Mich. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Entry of Judgment follows Finding of .Facts.

Whore a written request is made seasonably for a finding of facts, and judgment is entered without such finding, it is not error to set aside the judgment and enter a new one after the finding is filed. — Per Curiam.

Error to Kent.

The error assigned was that judgment could not be vacated and a new one entered without notice to the party against whom it had been rendered.

MacLaren & Jennings for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI