Hunt v. Parrish
334 S.W.2d 505, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2138
Opinion
This case is before us on remand, Tex. Sup., 331 S.W.2d 304. Conforming to the [506] direction of the Supreme Court, and since, as we have heretofore said, Tex.Civ.App., 324 S.W.2d 887, we cannot logically determine which of the two findings involved are contrary to the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence, we overrule appellants’ points 8 and 9 and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. Parrish, 334 S.W.2d 505, 1960 Tex. App. LEXIS 2138 (Tex. Ct. App. 1960).
334 S.W.2d 505 (Hunt v. Parrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roever v. Delaney
589 S.W.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Ramirez v. Garcia
437 S.W.2d 363 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Pederson v. Scott
366 S.W.2d 260 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)