Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co.

92 S.E. 217, 146 Ga. 701, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 452
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1917·Published

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

“The refusal of the judge to dismiss the case upon the ground that the petition was defective can not properly be made a subject for the assignment of error in a motion for new trial.”, Taylor v. Globe Refinery Company, 127 Ga. 138 (56 S. E. 292). As the plaintiff in error expressly abandoned the other grounds of the motion for new trial, the judgment must be Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co., 92 S.E. 217, 146 Ga. 701, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1917).

92 S.E. 217 (Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Globe Refinery Co.
56 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)