Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co.
92 S.E. 217, 146 Ga. 701, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 452
This text of 92 S.E. 217 (Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hunt v. New England Mortgage Security Co., 92 S.E. 217, 146 Ga. 701, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1917).
Opinion
“The refusal of the judge to dismiss the case upon the ground that the petition was defective can not properly be made a subject for the assignment of error in a motion for new trial.”, Taylor v. Globe Refinery Company, 127 Ga. 138 (56 S. E. 292). As the plaintiff in error expressly abandoned the other grounds of the motion for new trial, the judgment must be Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taylor v. Globe Refinery Co.
56 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 217, 146 Ga. 701, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-new-england-mortgage-security-co-ga-1917.