Hunt v. Morris

591 So. 2d 83, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 45, 1992 WL 8835

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 7, 1992·No. 1910421·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appellant having filed a motion for stay or injunction pending appeal, and the [84] same having been submitted and duly considered by the Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for stay is granted, and the order of the trial court of December 27, 1991, is hereby stayed.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, STEAGALL, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appellant having filed a motion for stay or injunction pending appeal, and the [84] same having been submitted and duly considered by the Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for stay is granted, and the order of the trial court of December 27, 1991, is hereby stayed.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, STEAGALL, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur. HOUSTON, J., concurs specially.

Hunt v. Morris, 591 So. 2d 83, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 45, 1992 WL 8835 (Ala. 1992).

Pincite

591 So. 2d 83 (Hunt v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.