Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

171 A.D. 920, 155 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 920 (Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 171 A.D. 920, 155 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury that defendant did not furnish the plaintiff a reasonably safe rein, is against the weight of the evidence. (See Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 164 App. Div. 953.) Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., concurred in the result upon the ground that no cause of action was proven.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict of the jury that defendant did not furnish the plaintiff a reasonably safe rein, is against the weight of the evidence. (See Hunt v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 164 App. Div. 953.) Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., concurred in the result upon the ground that no cause of action was proven.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 920, 155 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-knickerbocker-ice-co-nyappdiv-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack