Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/Hunt v. Keye

Hunt v. Keye

184 N.W. 840, 150 Minn. 142, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 746
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 21, 1921
DocketNo. 22,349
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 184 N.W. 840 (Hunt v. Keye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Keye, 184 N.W. 840, 150 Minn. 142, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 746 (Mich. 1921).

Opinion

Tati,or, C.

The controversy in this case is over the location of a boundary line in the townsite of Middle River located in the south half of the southwest quarter of section 10 in township 156 north of range 48 west in Marshall county. The townsite was platted two years or more after the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway had been constructed across this section, and lies on both sides of the railroad right of way. A copy of the plat will be found on page 144:

[144]*144

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neill v. Hake
93 N.W.2d 821 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Hoke v. Welsh
77 N.W.2d 659 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1956)
Korroll v. Trustees of School District No. 24
220 N.W. 413 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 N.W. 840, 150 Minn. 142, 1921 Minn. LEXIS 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-keye-minn-1921.