Hunt v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunt v. Hunt

184 A.D.2d 1011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1992

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 1011 (Hunt v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Hunt, 184 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering defendant to pay plaintiff’s counsel fees in the amount of $10,425 (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering defendant to pay plaintiff’s counsel fees in the amount of $10,425 (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack