Hunt v. Hunt
119 Mass. 474, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 61
Opinion
The ruling that, even if the testator intended to make a gift to the defendant of the bond in the possession of the latter, the evidence in the case was insufficient as matter of law to prove such delivery as was necessary to constitute a valid gift inter vivas, was erroneous. The question whether there was such delivery was a matter of fact, which should have been tried in the court below. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. Hunt, 119 Mass. 474, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 61 (Mass. 1876).
119 Mass. 474 (Hunt v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leitzell v. Peter
84 P.2d 416 (Utah Supreme Court, 1938)
Mangan v. Howard
130 N.E. 76 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Castle v. Persons
117 F. 835 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)
Lord v. New York Life Insurance Co.
56 L.R.A. 596 (Texas Supreme Court, 1902)
Dunn v. German-American Bank
109 Mo. 90 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Porter v. Gardner
15 N.Y.S. 398 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
McCann v. Randall
17 N.E. 75 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)