Hunt v. Gurney

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40388, 1995 WL 756334
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 1995
Docket95-7046
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Hunt v. Gurney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Gurney, 73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40388, 1995 WL 756334 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Roy Sylvester HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patrick J. GURNEY; P.A. Terrangi, Deputy Warden; J.E.
Clark, Assistant Deputy Warden; E.K. Brown, Counselor;
Larry Turner, Counselor; Clarence L. Jackson; Francis
Kafha; Ellis B. Wright, Warden; Wayne Brown; W.S.
Copeland; Edward W. Murray, Director; Peter G. Decker,
Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7046.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 28, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.

Roy Sylvester Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hunt v. Gurney, No. CA-94-385 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40388, 1995 WL 756334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-gurney-ca4-1995.