Hunt v. Guerin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Hunt v. Guerin

99 S.E. 809, 112 S.C. 305, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 119

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 14, 1919

Docket10234

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 809 (Hunt v. Guerin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Guerin, 99 S.E. 809, 112 S.C. 305, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 119 (S.C. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

The issue tried is the legal residence of one A. Morton Hunt, lately dead, testate, at Charleston. The will was offered for probate, at Charleston, but issue was made that *307 the adjoining county of Dorchester was the residence of the testator, and that the will ought, therefore, to be proved in that county.

The probate Court of Charleston sustained its jurisdiction, and the Circuit Court on appeal affirmed that judgment. And that is the sole issue here.

The testimony warrants a conclusion either way, and in such circumstances the judgment must be affirmed; ahd it is so ordered. Solomon’s case, 74 S. C. 189, 54 S. E. 207.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI