Hunt v. Guerin

99 S.E. 809, 112 S.C. 305, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 119
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 14, 1919·No. 10234·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

The issue tried is the legal residence of one A. Morton Hunt, lately dead, testate, at Charleston. The will was offered for probate, at Charleston, but issue was made that *307 the adjoining county of Dorchester was the residence of the testator, and that the will ought, therefore, to be proved in that county.

The probate Court of Charleston sustained its jurisdiction, and the Circuit Court on appeal affirmed that judgment. And that is the sole issue here.

The testimony warrants a conclusion either way, and in such circumstances the judgment must be affirmed; ahd it is so ordered. Solomon’s case, 74 S. C. 189, 54 S. E. 207.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Guerin, 99 S.E. 809, 112 S.C. 305, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 119 (S.C. 1919).

99 S.E. 809 (Hunt v. Guerin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Solomons' Estate
54 S.E. 207 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1906)