Hunt v. Greenville County

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 20, 2009
• Docket: 08-2348
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2348

WANDA HUNT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE AND RICE; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00857-HFF)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wanda Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Michael J. Bogle, Samuel W. Outten, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v.

Greenville County, No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED