Hunt v. Greenville County

Fourth Circuit

Hunt v. Greenville County

322 F. App'x 308

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2009·No. No. 08-2348·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v. Greenville County, No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF, 2008 WL 4844756 (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Hunt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Hunt v. Greenville County, No. 6:08-cv-857-HFF, 2008 WL 4844756 (D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hunt v. Greenville County, 322 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

322 F. App'x 308 (Hunt v. Greenville County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related