Hunt v. Grady

Fourth Circuit

Hunt v. Grady

599 F. App'x 531

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2015·No. No. 14-7637·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Grady, No. 5:12-cv-00144-RJC, 2014 WL 4829067 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 27, 2014). Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [532] legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunt v. Grady, No. 5:12-cv-00144-RJC, 2014 WL 4829067 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 27, 2014). Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [532] legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hunt v. Grady, 599 F. App'x 531 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

599 F. App'x 531 (Hunt v. Grady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related