Hunt v. Easterday

10 Neb. 165
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 Neb. 165 (Hunt v. Easterday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Easterday, 10 Neb. 165 (Neb. 1880).

Opinion

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action to enjoin the collection of taxes. The plaintiff alleges in Ms petition that he is the owner of more than four sections of land in Yesta precinct, in Johnson county, and that said lands were not lawfully assessed in the year 1871, because no oath of the assessor was made or attached to the assessment roll. It is also alleged that certain district school taxes are illegal, and that the defendant is treasurer of Johnson county, and is about to sell said land for said taxes. The prayer is that said taxes may be declared null and void. A demurrer was sustained to the petition in the court below, and the cause dismissed. The plaintiff appeals to this court. There is no equity in this petition. If the facts stated in the petition are true, no title would pass by a tax deed, and in an action at law for the possession of the premises under such deed, such illegality may be shown. But the owner of real estate cannot avoid the hazard of an adverse title by enjoining the collection of taxes if prop[167]*167erly assessed, unless lie pays, or offers to pay, the amount justly chargeable against his land. As the burden of taxation must be borne by all the taxable property in the state, there is a moral obligation resting upon every property owner to bear his proportion of the same; and unless he offers to do equity, a court of equity will not lift a finger to aid him.

The judgment of the district court is right, and must be affirmed.

Judgment aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Couts v. Cornell
82 P. 194 (California Supreme Court, 1905)
Wead v. City of Omaha
102 N.W. 675 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Barnes
51 N.W. 386 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Neb. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-easterday-neb-1880.