Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners
This text of 558 So. 2d 156 (Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER ON MOTION FOR STAY
Appellant files a motion to stay the final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners (Board), pending this appeal. We deny the motion for stay.
The final order of the Board, among other things, placed appellant’s license on probation for two years with specific restrictions. In support of his motion for stay pending appeal, appellant cites to Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, which states that “if the agency decision has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, super-sedeas shall be granted as a matter of right....” The final order of the Board neither suspended nor revoked the appellant’s license, accordingly, the automatic stay provision of Section 120.68(3), is not applicable. The motion for stay is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720, 1990 WL 26689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-department-of-professional-regulation-board-of-psychological-fladistctapp-1990.