Hunt v. Deforrest Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hunt v. Deforrest Ward

258 N.W. 145, 193 Minn. 168, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1072

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 4, 1935·No. No. 29,966.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

¹ Reported in 258 N.W. 145, 259 N.W. 12. One member of the court being incapacitated by illness, this court stands three to three on the question of whether or not the error committed by the trial court in its charge to the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. Therefore the order of the trial court is affirmed without opinion.

ON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT. On February 8, 1935, the following opinion was filed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¹ Reported in 258 N.W. 145, 259 N.W. 12. One member of the court being incapacitated by illness, this court stands three to three on the question of whether or not the error committed by the trial court in its charge to the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. Therefore the order of the trial court is affirmed without opinion.

ON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT. On February 8, 1935, the following opinion was filed:

Hunt v. Deforrest Ward, 258 N.W. 145, 193 Minn. 168, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1072 (Mich. 1935).

Pincite

258 N.W. 145 (Hunt v. Deforrest Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related