Hunt v. Deforrest Ward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hunt v. Deforrest Ward

258 N.W. 145, 193 Minn. 168, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1072

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 4, 1935

DocketNo. 29,966.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 N.W. 145 (Hunt v. Deforrest Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Deforrest Ward, 258 N.W. 145, 193 Minn. 168, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1072 (Mich. 1935).

Pincite

Opinions

¹ Reported in 258 N.W. 145, 259 N.W. 12. One member of the court being incapacitated by illness, this court stands three to three on the question of whether or not the error committed by the trial court in its charge to the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. Therefore the order of the trial court is affirmed without opinion.

ON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT. On February 8, 1935, the following opinion was filed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¹ Reported in 258 N.W. 145, 259 N.W. 12. One member of the court being incapacitated by illness, this court stands three to three on the question of whether or not the error committed by the trial court in its charge to the jury was prejudicial to the defendant. Therefore the order of the trial court is affirmed without opinion.

ON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT. On February 8, 1935, the following opinion was filed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 N.W. 145, 193 Minn. 168, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-deforrest-ward-minn-1935.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack