Hunt v. Connor

17 Abb. Pr. 466
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 Abb. Pr. 466 (Hunt v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Connor, 17 Abb. Pr. 466 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).

Opinion

Clerke, J.

I think the provisions of the Revised Statutes, as to costs against executors and administrators, referred to in section.317 of the Code, apply only to the general costs of the action, and have no reference to appeal or interlocutory costs. The statute relating to costs in error or appeal is general,— that the successful party shall recover costs, without any exception in favor of executors or administrators; and, as Justice [467]*467Bronson says in Judah a. Stagg (22 Wend., 641), “We are not authorized to make an exception which the Legislature has not thought proper to make.”

The respective orders of the general term, in the case before us, provide that costs should abide the event, and the amount and items adjusted appear to be correct.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, however.

Leonard and Sutherland, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hewlett v. Van Voorhis
197 A.D. 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
In re Miller
4 Redf. 302 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Abb. Pr. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-connor-nysupct-1864.