Hunt v. Connecticut

392 U.S. 304, 88 S. Ct. 2063, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1110, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1365
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1968·No. 117 M·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Connecticut, 392 U.S. 304, 88 S. Ct. 2063, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1110, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1365 (1968).

392 U.S. 304 (Hunt v. Connecticut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McLucas
375 A.2d 1014 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1977)
State v. Holup
355 A.2d 119 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1974)
People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
State v. Hunt
251 A.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)
United States v. Sims
297 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Tennessee, 1968)