Hunt v. Coachman

27 S.C. Eq. 286
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 27 S.C. Eq. 286 (Hunt v. Coachman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunt v. Coachman, 27 S.C. Eq. 286 (S.C. Ct. App. 1854).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This Court concurs in the decree of the Chancellor, and it is ordered that his judgment be affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

Johnston, DuNKiNand Wardlaw, CC., concurring. Da'rgan, Oh., absent.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.C. Eq. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-coachman-scctapp-1854.