Hunt v. Clark
This text of 3 N.J.L. 466 (Hunt v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state of demand though not very intelligible, yet it is sufficiently so to show that it is a demand madé by the plaintiffs against the captain of a sloop, for the amount of the sales of a sloop load of brick, taken by him to New-York, and sold as agent to the plaintiffs, evidenced by a bill rendered; and whether one of the plaintiffs were part owner of the sloop or not, was of no importance, and therefore, the evidence properly rejected; the action must be considered as between principal and factor.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-clark-nj-1808.