Hunt v. City of Salem
121 Mass. 294, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 358
Opinion
The injury having happened while the plaintiff was moving onward, and all the attending circumstances being disclosed by his testimony, the questions whether, at the time, he was travelling upon the highway, and was using due care, were rightly submitted to the jury.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. City of Salem, 121 Mass. 294, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 358 (Mass. 1876).
121 Mass. 294 (Hunt v. City of Salem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MacKinnon v. City of Medford
111 N.E.2d 449 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1953)
Wershba v. City of Lynn
86 N.E.2d 511 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Millay v. Town Taxi, Inc.
136 N.E. 127 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Irvine v. Town of Greenwood
72 S.E. 228 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)
Mobus v. Town of Waitsfield
53 A. 775 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1902)
Reed v. City of Madison
17 L.R.A. 733 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1892)
Graham v. City of Boston
30 N.E. 170 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Gulline v. City of Lowell
11 N.E. 723 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Varney v. Manchester
58 N.H. 430 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1878)