Hunt v. Canton Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hunt v. Canton Fertilizer Co.

99 S.E. 539, 23 Ga. App. 805, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 366

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 1919

Docket10350

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 539 (Hunt v. Canton Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Canton Fertilizer Co., 99 S.E. 539, 23 Ga. App. 805, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

In this case it was sought to set aside a judgment rendered in the absence of the movant and one of her attorneys, and to reinstate the case. The evidence was amply sufficient to support a finding that the movant was lacking in diligence; and the^e was no abuse of discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment and reinstate the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

In this case it was sought to set aside a judgment rendered in the absence of the movant and one of her attorneys, and to reinstate the case. The evidence was amply sufficient to support a finding that the movant was lacking in diligence; and the^e was no abuse of discretion in refusing to vacate the judgment and reinstate the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 S.E. 539, 23 Ga. App. 805, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-canton-fertilizer-co-gactapp-1919.