Hunt v. Brooks
18 Johns. 5
This text of 18 Johns. 5 (Hunt v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hunt v. Brooks, 18 Johns. 5 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1820).
Opinion
The Court, in October term, when they allowed the defendant his audita querela, decided that it should not operate as a supersedeas to the execution. We did not mean to set aside or stay the execution. This is a re[7]*7newal of the same application, nied. The motion must be eta
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alcott v. Avery
1 Barb. Ch. 347 (New York Court of Chancery, 1846)
Union Canal Co. v. Young
1 Whart. 410 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)
Wardell v. Eden
2 Johns. Cas. 258 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 Johns. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-brooks-nysupct-1820.