Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights
103 A. 1052, 91 N.J.L. 696, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights, 103 A. 1052, 91 N.J.L. 696, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1918).
103 A. 1052 (Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maryland Racing Commission v. Maryland Jockey Club
4 A.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1939)