Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights
103 A. 1052, 91 N.J.L. 696, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 213
This text of 103 A. 1052 (Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hunt v. Borough of Haddon Heights, 103 A. 1052, 91 N.J.L. 696, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1918).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maryland Racing Commission v. Maryland Jockey Club
4 A.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 A. 1052, 91 N.J.L. 696, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-borough-of-haddon-heights-nj-1918.