Hunt v. Blanchard

California Court of Appeal

Hunt v. Blanchard

112 Cal. App. 557

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 16, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 7676

StatusPublished

This text of 112 Cal. App. 557 (Hunt v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunt v. Blanchard, 112 Cal. App. 557 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAY, J., pro tem.

This appeal from a judgment quieting title, being based upon the judgment-roll alone, does not permit Consideration of alleged errors in the admission of evidence, of alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sup-, port the findings, or, of the alleged omission to make findings, but confines consideration to the single question as to sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment. (2 Cal. Jur. 690.) Our examination of the judgment-roll satisfies us that the findings are decisive of the issues presented by the pleadings and amply support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAY, J., pro tem.

This appeal from a judgment quieting title, being based upon the judgment-roll alone, does not permit Consideration of alleged errors in the admission of evidence, of alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sup-, port the findings, or, of the alleged omission to make findings, but confines consideration to the single question as to sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment. (2 Cal. Jur. 690.) Our examination of the judgment-roll satisfies us that the findings are decisive of the issues presented by the pleadings and amply support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 Cal. App. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-blanchard-calctapp-1931.