Hunt v. Bayer Corporation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hunt v. Bayer Corporation

941 A.2d 1262, 596 Pa. 217, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 59

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 7, 2008·No. 24 EM 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief Invoking this Honorable Court’s King’s Bench Powers and Requesting a Stay of Proceedings and the Application for Leave to File a Response to the Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s King’s Bench Petition are DISMISSED AS MOOT due to the discontinuance of the action filed at No. 1038 February Term 2005 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2008, the Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief Invoking this Honorable Court’s King’s Bench Powers and Requesting a Stay of Proceedings and the Application for Leave to File a Response to the Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s King’s Bench Petition are DISMISSED AS MOOT due to the discontinuance of the action filed at No. 1038 February Term 2005 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Hunt v. Bayer Corporation, 941 A.2d 1262, 596 Pa. 217, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 59 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

941 A.2d 1262 (Hunt v. Bayer Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.