Hunt v. Alamo

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 31, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-09151·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

WILLIAM HUNT, Plaintiff, 23 Civ. 9151 (PAE) -\Y- ORDER MICHAEL J. ALAMO, et ai., Defendants.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On November 13, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 15, On November 14, 2023, the Court directed plaintiff to either amend the complaint or oppose the motion to dismiss by September 8, 2023, Dkt. 20, a deadline later extended to January 8, 2024, Dkt. 24. As of the entry of this order, however, plaintiff has failed to either amend his complaint or oppose defendants’ motion (or seek a further extension). The deadline to amend the complaint has now passed. If plaintiff, by February 5, 2024, has not filed an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, the Court will treat the motion to dismiss as unopposed. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Redbubble, Inc., No. 21 Civ. 2973 (VSB), 2023 WL 6294180, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2023). SO ORDERED. Fal AG ANN Na PAUL A. ENGELMAYER # United States District Judge Dated: January 31, 2024 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hunt v. Alamo, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Hunt v. Alamo (Hunt v. Alamo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.