Hunt v. Alamo
This text of Hunt v. Alamo (Hunt v. Alamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
WILLIAM HUNT, Plaintiff, 23 Civ. 9151 (PAE) -\Y- ORDER MICHAEL J. ALAMO, et ai., Defendants.
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On November 13, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 15, On November 14, 2023, the Court directed plaintiff to either amend the complaint or oppose the motion to dismiss by September 8, 2023, Dkt. 20, a deadline later extended to January 8, 2024, Dkt. 24. As of the entry of this order, however, plaintiff has failed to either amend his complaint or oppose defendants’ motion (or seek a further extension). The deadline to amend the complaint has now passed. If plaintiff, by February 5, 2024, has not filed an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, the Court will treat the motion to dismiss as unopposed. See, e.g., Rodriguez v. Redbubble, Inc., No. 21 Civ. 2973 (VSB), 2023 WL 6294180, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2023). SO ORDERED. Fal AG ANN Na PAUL A. ENGELMAYER # United States District Judge Dated: January 31, 2024 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hunt v. Alamo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-alamo-nysd-2024.