Hunsucker v. . Farmer and Farmer

72 N.C. 372
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1875
StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.C. 372 (Hunsucker v. . Farmer and Farmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunsucker v. . Farmer and Farmer, 72 N.C. 372 (N.C. 1875).

Opinion

Reade, J.

The rule is that the declarations of a third person are but hearsay, and not evidence. The person himself ought to be introduced as a witness. There are some exceptions to this rule, but there is nothing to bring the declaration of Bates within the exceptions. They were offered to prove a “ transaction,” and that the defendant had used “ due diligence ” in endeavoring to collect a debt, which plaintiff' alleged he was bound for, if at all, only as guarantor.

As this error entitles the plaintiff to a new trial, it is not necessary to decide other points raised, as they will probably be avoided on the next trial.

There is error. Venire de novo.

Pee CuRIAm. Venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 N.C. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunsucker-v-farmer-and-farmer-nc-1875.