Hunstein v. Hunstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hunstein v. Hunstein

6 A.D.2d 1048, 179 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 1048 (Hunstein v. Hunstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hunstein v. Hunstein, 6 A.D.2d 1048, 179 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover money claimed to be due under a separation agreement, on a written account rendered in connection therewith, and under a further agreement contained in the account, the appeal is from an order granting respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Appellant’s deposition, upon which respondent herself relies, is to the effect that a loan of $10,000 from a named corporation was made not to appellant alone, but to appellant and respondent jointly. Accordingly, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the loan was an indebtedness on the part of appellant such as was contemplated in the agreement contained in the account, that is, the existence of which would require appellant to pay respondent half the amount of the indebtedness. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover money claimed to be due under a separation agreement, on a written account rendered in connection therewith, and under a further agreement contained in the account, the appeal is from an order granting respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Appellant’s deposition, upon which respondent herself relies, is to the effect that a loan of $10,000 from a named corporation was made not to appellant alone, but to appellant and respondent jointly. Accordingly, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the loan was an indebtedness on the part of appellant such as was contemplated in the agreement contained in the account, that is, the existence of which would require appellant to pay respondent half the amount of the indebtedness. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 1048, 179 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunstein-v-hunstein-nyappdiv-1958.