Hunsinger v. Leachman

259 S.E.2d 633, 244 Ga. 104, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1130
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 5, 1979
Docket34891
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 S.E.2d 633 (Hunsinger v. Leachman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hunsinger v. Leachman, 259 S.E.2d 633, 244 Ga. 104, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1130 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The trial court did not err in finding that it was too late for the husband to challenge the constitutionality of our alimony laws in defense of a contempt citation. Kirkpatrick v. Woodruff, 243 Ga. 736 (256 SE2d 465) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Binkley v. Flatt
568 S.E.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Shepherd v. Shepherd
261 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 633, 244 Ga. 104, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunsinger-v-leachman-ga-1979.